From left, President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan, President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in Washington

News of the deal that Donald Trump believes might win him the Nobel Peace Prize did not make front-page headlines in Germany. What sparse coverage appeared was light on content, and less than enthusiastic in tone. The general line was: a deal has been made, but there is a long way to go.  The evening news on German national television channel 1 focused on the agreement for a land corridor between Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan, calling it a “deal tailored to Trump’s taste,” and noted the damage done to Iran, by blocking its border with Armenia, as well as the demotion Russia would receive as regional power. Nonetheless, the gist was, it may be a big step in cooling tensions but it is not a peace agreement.

The position of the German federal government was expressed on August 8 by Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, who said the agreement meant “hope for many people in Armenia and Azerbaijan who look back on a long past with conflict, expulsions, and suffering.” He seemed to claim a share in the “success,” saying Germany had been “pursuing this aim with its partners through regular high-level exchanges,” and referenced peace negotiations in Berlin last year.

The thinking in government circles could be gleaned from articles appearing in publications of the two coalition parties ruling in Berlin, the Social Democrats (SPD) and the Christian Democrats (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU). The gist was: underneath the typically bombastic Trumpian rhetoric of a historic peace, etc., the reality is yes, progress has been made, the decades-long conflict has been suspended, but it is still a long way to peace.

‘Handshake … for the Moment?’

An expert on the region, Marcel Röthig, who was interviewed on television, issued a detailed analysis in the Journal for International Politics and Society, published by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, a thinktank close to the SPD. Röthig, based in Tbilisi, is the director of the foundation’s South Caucasus regional office and is responsible for Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.

Whether the “peace” orchestrated by Trump, he writes, holds or not is uncertain, but it has reshuffled the cards in the region. With pungent irony, Röthig says that it seemed as if Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and his Armenian counterpart Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan were “competing to see who could propose Trump for the Nobel peace prize.” Big talk, quotes from the Bible and Louis Armstrong provided the pomp, but it’s just a beginning, he adds. Pashinyan is under pressure from the opposition for having omitted key demands for freeing the Armenian prisoners as well as the right of return for the Artsakh Armenians expelled, Then the other serious omissions: defined borders and security guarantees in the event of renewed.

Get the Mirror in your inbox:

The clear winner, he writes, is Azerbaijan, with its long-sought corridor, which will pave the way for oil and gas pipelines and enhanced access through Turkey to Europe. In fact, the EU signaled its support right after the signing ceremony. Another winner is Turkey, which will have “a free trade route to the Caspian Sea — and thence to Central Asia and China.” Moscow stands to lose a lot, its “sanction-free North-South route” through Iran and India as well as its role as regional power. Its role as security guarantor for Armenia has vanished. Röthig sees this as a “liberation from Russia’s firm grip” for Armenia, also with respect to dependance on Russian oil and gas, as well as nuclear energy. The think-tanker proposes this distancing could lead to closer relations with the EU and NATO. At the same time, Moscow’s relations to Baku are weakened, something Putin may not accept—and that could lead to conflict.

The Konrad Adenauer Foundation, the thinktank of the CDU-CSU, issued a similar reading in its “Country Report,” in an article by Jacob Wöllnstein, “Historical Breakthrough in the South Caucasus?” The stress seems to be on the question mark. If the thinktanks’ analyses reflect the respective parties’ assessments of the Trump peace deal, one would conclude that Berlin would support the thrust of the deal, but is painfully aware of its inherent dangers.

The Armenians in Germany?

The embassy of Azerbaijan trumpeted its great satisfaction, headlining, “Historic Breakthrough in Washington” on its Facebook page. Although no statement has appeared on the Armenian Embassy’s website, it should reflect the government’s position.

As Pashinyan comes under pressure from the opposition at home, another important question arises: what about the Armenian diaspora in Germany? To date the Central Council of Armenians in Germany (ZAD) has not issued any statement on the deal. The German-Armenian Society (DAG) has not yet presented a declaration either. Instead, it informs readers that the DAG has always stood for a peaceful resolution of conflict and dialogue. Though promoting civil society and dialogue, it does not participate directly in any negotiations.

Get the Mirror-Spectator Weekly in your inbox: