Armenia & Karabakh International Azerbaijani Sham Trials European Union International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)Political Prisoners UN Refugee Agency UNDP

UNDP, UNHCR, and ICRC ‘Told to Leave’ Azerbaijan

March 6, 2025

by

The Armenian Mirror-Spectator

119

According to pro-government media outlet Caliber, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) have been told “they must leave” Azerbaijan.

Previously, the Baku offices of these organizations were “notified about the need to review the format of cooperation,” Caliber reported on Sunday, March 2, citing the information available to their editorial team.

According to Caliber, the main reason for the decision was that Azerbaijan is now able to “address emerging challenges independently,” including those specifically related to Nagorno-Karabakh, noting that in 2025, more than $2.4 billion have already been allocated for the reconstruction of the region.

In addition, Caliber cited an example from the EU as proof Azerbaijan was not “reinventing the wheel” by refusing international support, noting that several refugee support centers established in Poland by the UNHCR in 2022 to assist Ukrainian refugees in transit zones were closed the following year after refugee needs changed and there was a shift towards more sustainability in aid, including increased collaboration with local organizations and municipalities.

Beyond citing Azerbaijan’s growth, Caliber also criticized the UNDP for alleged “corruption, systemic management failures, and a lack of transparency,” citing an audit conducted by the UNDP’s Office of Internal Audit and Investigations.

In particular, the article claimed that in 2023, the UNDP allocated $754,570 to 23 local civil society organizations which were not properly registered with the state, calling it a “flagrant disregard for legal and ethical standards.”

ADVERTISMENT

Both the UNDP and UNHCR have been working in Azerbaijan since 1992.

Continued Attacks on the ICRC

In addition to criticizing the two UN agencies, Caliber, focusing on the ICRC specifically, highlighted that Azerbaijan had “serious suspicions of hostile, particularly espionage activities by the ICRC against the Azerbaijani Army” during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War.

“We have repeatedly witnessed that the ICRC operates under double standards, with anti-Turkish chauvinism, indulgence towards Armenian provocations, and complete indifference to the problems of Azerbaijanis, among other issues,” Caliber wrote.

In contrast, an investigation by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) published August 2024 revealed the ways in which Azerbaijan reportedly impeded the humanitarian work of the ICRC and how the Azerbaijani Red Crescent Society supported Azerbaijani government narratives.

The OCCRP investigation — which lasted more than a year and was based on data about ICRC convoys “provided by inside sources,” as well as interviews and on-the-ground reporting — claimed that the Azerbaijan Red Crescent was “deeply enmeshed with the authoritarian regime of President Ilham Aliyev.”

The Armenian Mirror-Spectator

Topics: Azerbaijani Sham Trials, European Union, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Political Prisoners, UN Refugee Agency, UNDP

People: Ruben Vardanyan

MORE FROM Armenia & Karabakh

Armenian music Jazz

Arman Peshtmaljyan: ‘My Musical Thinking Is Shaped by Diversity’

In particular, the investigation reported that during the blockade of the Lachin Corridor, the Azerbaijan Red Crescent organized a protest near the Aghdam road to the region, demanding access for itself.

The ICRC played a crucial role in evacuating the region’s population in need of advanced medical treatment during the blockade, which began in December 2022. The region’s population, which numbered over 100,000, saw shortages not only of food and fuel, but also medical supplies, which challenged the work of the medics.

Despite the International Court of Justice’s decision obliging Azerbaijan to ensure “unimpeded movement” along the enclave’s only road to Armenia in both directions, the OCCRP claims that Azerbaijan ‘severely limited” even the ICRC’s ability to operate there.

The ICRC was one of two international organizations officially represented in Nagorno-Karabakh before the 2020 war — the second, Halo Trust, closed in 2023.

Currently, the ICRC is the only organization who has met with Armenian prisoners in Azerbaijan, focusing on recording the conditions of their detentions and their health.

Azerbaijan has officially acknowledged 23 Armenian prisoners, including former Nagorno-Karabakh officials, most notably former State Minister Ruben Vardanyan.

Azerbaijan’s Civil Society Continues to Shrink

Repression against civil society organizations in Azerbaijan first began in 2014, after the government changed legislation to only allow international organizations to provide grants if it had a branch or representative office registered in Azerbaijan and entered into an agreement with the Justice Ministry. In addition, such organizations had to apply for permission to host any events, from training sessions to conferences.

Following this, in December 2014, the former chair of the Presidential Administration, Ramiz Mehdiyev, wrote an article claiming that local and international civil society organizations in Azerbaijan were acting as a fifth column.

According to prominent human rights lawyer Intigam Aliyev, “first, authoritarian governments constantly need an image of an enemy to distract attention from the ineffective social and economic policies they pursue, corruption, monopolies, the arbitrariness of officials, courts and the police. This image can be the Council of Europe, the EU, USAID, UN agencies, or France and Iran.”

Speaking to OC Media, Aliyev noted all of these organizations have worked in Azerbaijan for many years, and have been partnered with state agencies more than other civil society groups.

“A significant part of the grants they allocate are aimed at financing joint projects with the state. The effectiveness of most of them and their benefit to the country has always been a subject of debate. In terms of transparency, it is no different from projects financed from the state budget,” Aliyev said.

(This article originally appeared on the website www.oc-media.org on March 3.)

Previous Bishop Mesrop Urges President to Help Free Artsakh Detainees

Next Demonstrations in Yerevan Call for Release of Armenians held in Azerbaijan

Discover more cities:

Top 5 Articles