Three Senior Defense Ministry Officials Arrested on Corruption Charges


YEREVAN (RFE/RL) — An army general and two other senior Armenian Defense Ministry officials have been arrested in separate corruption investigations conducted by law-enforcement authorities, it emerged on June 1.

Gen. Melsik Chilingarian
Gen. Melsik Chilingarian

was taken into custody late Monday, 10 days after being sacked as head of the ministry’s Department of Armaments which deals with storage, maintenance and repair of weapons and ammunition supplied to the Armenian armed forces.

Also arrested was Col. Armen Markarian, one of Chilingarian’s subordinates who was in charge of vehicles used by the army. Markarian was fired earlier in May.

Armenia’s Investigative Committee said the two men are suspected of abuse of power that resulted in “severe consequences.”

The third suspect, Col. Mher Papian, holds a senior position in the Defense Ministry’s Department on Material-Technical Procurements tasked with arms procurements. He was detained as part of a separate inquiry conducted by the Investigative Committee. The law-enforcement agency said Papian may face prosecution on charges of “negligent attitude towards military service” which also led to “severe consequences.”

A spokeswoman for the committee said that investigators will specifically look into the quality of various items which the arrested officials provided to the Armed Forces and determine whether they were purchased at inflated prices. She did not go into details.

Get the Mirror in your inbox:

Incidentally, President Serzh Sargsyan dismissed Papian’s immediate superior, Deputy Defense Minister Alik Mirzabekian, as well as Gen. Arshak Karapetian, the military intelligence chief, and Gen. Komitas Muradian, the commander of the Armenian army’s communication units, in late April.

The sackings came more than three weeks after the outbreak of heavy fighting around Nagorno-Karabakh that nearly escalated into a full-scale Armenian-Azerbaijani war. A senior pro-government lawmaker attributed them to “shortcomings” in the Armenian military’s response to an Azerbaijani offensive in Karabagh.

The four-day hostilities raised questions about the Armenian military’s apparent lack of prior knowledge of the assault. Critics also suggested that Karabagh Armenian frontline troops did not have sufficient modern weapons and other military equipment when they came under attack.

Sargsyan and other Armenian officials have insisted that the Azerbaijani offensive failed because it was aimed at achieving significant territorial gains that would have led to a “military solution” to the Karabagh conflict.”



Get the Mirror-Spectator Weekly in your inbox: