Outgoing Foreign Minister Ara Ayvazian addresses Armenian Foreign Ministry staff, Yerevan, May 31, 2021 (official publication)

More Questions Raised About Pashinyan’s 2020 Land Handover to Azerbaijan

167
0

By Ruzanna Stepanian

YEREVAN (Azatutyun) — Former Foreign Minister Ara Ayvazyan has claimed that he was kept in the dark about the handover to Azerbaijan of contested border areas along Armenia’s Syunik province which Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan controversially ordered in December 2020.

Armenian troops withdrew from those areas more than a month after a Russian-brokered ceasefire that stopped the six-week war in Nagorno-Karabakh. The withdrawal sparked angry protests by Syunik residents concerned about the security of their communities.

Nearly one year later, Azerbaijan seized full control of a 21-kilometer section of the main highway that connected the provincial towns of Goris and Kapan. It was part of Armenia’s only overland transport link with neighboring Iran. The Azerbaijani move made the highway section off limits to Armenian, Iranian and other vehicles, forcing the Armenian government to hastily build a 70-kilometer bypass road in Syunik.

Around the same time, the government allowed several opposition parliamentarians to see a copy of a document that mandated the Armenian troop withdrawal. According to one of those lawmakers, Gegham Manukyan, the memorandum signed only by the then defense ministers of Armenia and Russia listed no legal grounds for the handover.

Manukyan insisted on Monday, July 29, that he believes the handover was illegal because it was carried out “without any delimitation and demarcation” of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. This is why, he said, Pashinyan’s administration withheld any information about the memorandum for almost a year.

Get the Mirror in your inbox:

“I’m sure that Armenia’s future authorities, law-enforcement system will deal with that in the near future,” said Manukyan.

Ayvazyan, who was appointed as foreign minister just days after the November 2020 coup, said that the document was kept secret from him and the Foreign Ministry as a whole during his six-month tenure.

“When [word of] it emerged, I appealed, through the prime minister, to the Defense Ministry to share that document with us,” he told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service “But I didn’t manage to familiarize myself with the document during my tenure.”

“It’s not just the Foreign Ministry that wasn’t aware. The Armenian people were deceived,” Manukyan charged in this regard.

The opposition leader also said that the December 2020 document did not call for Azerbaijani control over the Goris-Kapan road.

“According to that memorandum, Armenian and Azerbaijani border guards were due to be deployed on either side of the road and it should not have been controlled by any party,” he said.

The Armenian Defense Ministry likewise stated in December 2020 that the disputed road section will be controlled by Russian troops. This seems to explain why Pashinyan accused Baku of breaching trilateral understandings when traffic through it was first disrupted in August 2021.

Speaking in the Armenian parliament in October 2021, Pashinyan admitted personally ordering the controversial troop withdrawal. He claimed that failure to do so would have led Azerbaijan to invade Syunik.

Pashinyan gave the same explanation for his decision earlier this year to cede to Azerbaijan four smaller but equally important border areas in Armenia’s northern Tavush province. The decision sparked protests by residents of local border communities. They escalated into massive anti-government demonstrations in Yerevan in May and June.

The protest leader, Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, has pledged to resume his campaign for Pashinyan’s resignation this fall. A recently created association of retired senior diplomats, including Ayvazyan, aligned itself with Galstanyan’s opposition-backed movement ahead of the Yerevan rallies.

Get the Mirror-Spectator Weekly in your inbox: