Economist Gagik Makaryan

Russian Official Warns Government Could Advise Tourists Not to Visit Armenia

438
0

By Irina Atanyan

Special to the Mirror-Spectator

YEREVAN — Russian tourists have a huge presence in Armenia, even though relations between the governments of the two countries is increasingly strained. The most recent example of the worsening relationship was a phone conversation between Speaker of the Armenian National Assembly Ruben Rubinyan and Chairwoman of the Federation Council of Russia Valentina Matviyenko on August 6, the latter stated that if the “systematic arrests” of Russian citizens in Armenia continue, Russia could advise its tourists against visiting Armenia.

The statement did not specify what arrests she was speaking about.

But what impact could this have on Armenia if Russian tourists stop visiting the country?

According to data from Armenia’s Tourism Committee, 198,709 tourists visited Armenia in July 2026. During the same month last year, the number of tourist arrivals stood at 263,592. This means that tourist arrivals decreased by 64,883 compared with July 2025.

Get the Mirror in your inbox:

During the same period, Russian citizens accounted for the largest share of tourist arrivals, at 40 percent. They were followed by visitors from Georgia at 15 percent and Iran at 8 percent.

This raises the question: if the flow of Russian tourists declines following a possible recommendation from Moscow, what consequences could this have for the Armenian economy?

Economist Gagik Makaryan said the presence of tourists, including those from Russia, has a significant impact on small and micro-businesses in Armenia, such as restaurants, cafés, taxi services, souvenir sellers and individuals renting out apartments all benefit from tourists’ spending.

“If these tourists are no longer here and they follow their leadership’s call and stop visiting Armenia, small businesses will suffer,” he said.

He noted that the consequences could be reflected not only in sales, but also in employment and income levels.

“It’s not that tourists will stop coming altogether; the number of visitors will simply decrease, and that could also lead to a certain decline in business profitability. Naturally, this would mean that businesses would pay less in taxes, employers would start cutting jobs and would stop hiring new employees because there would not be enough money circulating,” Makaryan said.

“Tourists rent apartments. Some come not through travel agencies but on their own, and they do not always stay in hotels; they rent people’s homes. Therefore, this segment of society would also be affected,” Markaryan said.

At the same time, Makaryan said he that replacing the potential loss of the Russian tourism market with tourists from other countries in a short period of time would not be easy.

According to him, economic problems and rising airfares affect the mobility of European tourists, while the number of visits to Armenia by members of the Armenian diaspora is no longer as high as it used to be.

“It’s not as though Russian tourism can easily and smoothly be replaced by tourism from other countries,” the economist stressed.

Anna Navasardyan, a tourism sector expert

Anna Navasardyan, a tourism sector expert, concurred. According to her, Armenia’s dependence on the Russian market is significant, as Russian citizens continue to represent one of Armenia’s main tourism markets.

“For Armenia, Russia is one of the most important markets in the tourism sector. Even from a professional perspective, when we assess the level of dependence, it is very high,” Navasardyan said.

She said she that if Armenia wants to reduce its dependence on a single market, it needs to actively work on attracting tourists from new markets.

In her assessment, the fact that July is considered a peak month for tourism, while tourist flows have already declined significantly in Armenia, is a warning sign that the government should reconsider its marketing policies in the tourism sector and its strategy for attracting new markets.

At the same time, commenting on Matviyenko’s statement, Navasardyan stressed that tourism should not be politicized.

“Tourism is about people interacting more, visiting new countries and discovering different cultures, rather than making political statements,” she said.

But are Russian tourists apt to listen to their government and consider not visiting Armenia?

At Yerevan’s Vernissage market, Russian tourist Vyacheslav Goren said he would not follow such a recommendation. “No, I would not follow that advice. I don’t see any problem.”

Goren added that the political tensions between Armenia and Russia would not be a reason for him to stop visiting Armenia.

“I see a political escalation between the two countries,” he said, adding that he approves of the policies pursued by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Another Russian tourist also said she would not follow such advice.

“Under no circumstances would we do that. Even if Russia gives such a recommendation, that does not mean that we Russians will stop visiting Armenia. If we want to come, we will come anyway,” the young woman said.

She added that she travels to Armenia without any restrictions and feels comfortable there.

Another Russian tourist said that a recommendation from Moscow would not change his decision to visit Armenia.

He explained that he has two passports, has friends in Armenia and has visited the country many times.

“I have friends here and I have been to Armenia many times already. I really like it here, so I will come anyway,” he said.

Another young couple suggested an alternative route: “I would go to another country, for example Kazakhstan, and then travel to Armenia. If I wanted to come, we would find a way.”

Get the Mirror-Spectator Weekly in your inbox: