YEREVAN/ZURICH — Joel Veldkamp (born in 1988 in Iowa) is the director for Public Advocacy at Christian Solidarity International (CSI), a Switzerland-based human rights organization advocating for religious freedom and the protection of persecuted communities worldwide. He holds a PhD in international history from the Geneva Graduate Institute, an MA in Middle Eastern studies from the University of Chicago, and a BA from Dordt University (Iowa). Veldkamp’s academic research has focused on the modern history of the Middle East, including the experience of Christian communities in Syria. Through his work with CSI, he has traveled extensively across the broader Middle East and North Africa, documenting humanitarian conditions and engaging in international advocacy. He has addressed forums such as the United Nations Human Rights Council on issues including religious persecution, economic sanctions, and the protection of vulnerable minorities.
Joel, as an Armenian living in Armenia my first question is: in your opinion, how do geopolitical dynamics shape humanitarian policies in our region?
Unfortunately, the South Caucasus is at the center of a new “great game” for influence being played between Russia and the United States. In such a situation, humanitarian and human rights considerations will always take a back seat to the hard interests of the great powers. Nearly 30 years ago, the influential American statesman Zbigniew Brzezinski described Azerbaijan as a “geopolitical pivot” that would be crucial for the U.S.’s efforts to contain Russian power. This is essentially how the U.S. still sees the region. Russia has also clearly decided that it needs the goodwill of Turkey and Azerbaijan to preserve its influence in its near abroad. Both sides need Azerbaijan, and so Azerbaijan is mostly allowed to do what it wants – including ethnic cleansing.
What role does international advocacy play in protecting human dignity and religious freedom?
The realities of hard power severely limit what international advocacy can accomplish, of course. But we should not give in to despair. Even when the great powers are not responsive, advocacy can shape public opinion in ways that exert pressure over the long-term.
One good example is that only 20 years ago, there was still considerable reluctance in academia and among governments to speak the words “Armenian Genocide.” Now it is broadly accepted as historical reality, and only marginal scholars and states contest it. There was no political calculus behind this shift. This victory is owed completely to the thankless labor of thousands of Armenians over the past century.


