David Phillips

The Seeds of Future Conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan

574
0

By David L. Phillips

The government of Azerbaijan heralds a peace agreement normalizing relations with Armenia. But the deal is so one-sided it won’t create conditions for sustainable peace. By enshrining victor’s justice, the deal sows the seeds for resentment and future hostilities between the two Caucasus countries who have fought two bloody wars since 1992 and remain at odds over a number of unresolved issues.

Azerbaijan seized Nagorno-Karabakh, called “Artsakh” by Armenians, in a lightning military operation in September 2023. Up to 120,000 Armenians fled to Armenia abandoning their properties and churches to Azerbaijan’s armed forces. Displaced and demoralized, refugees from Artsakh have been resettled in deplorable conditions.

The government of Armenia had no choice but to acquiesce to Azerbaijan’s demands. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan had a gun to his head in negotiations with Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliev.

The agreement eliminates the Minsk Group of the Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe which spent decades trying to mediate between the Caucasus countries. They fought to draw in the 1990s. However, Azerbaijan spent its oil wealth on missiles and other sophisticated weapons giving it a decided advantage. Turkey’s material and logistical assistance also tilted the battlefield.

The agreement disallows armed forces from third countries on the border. The European Union Monitoring Mission played a critical role preventing the escalation of conflict until 2023 when Azerbaijani forces invaded. The ban on foreign forces covers Russian border guards who policed parts of Armenia’s frontiers.

Get the Mirror in your inbox:

Moscow pledged to guarantee implementation of the 2022 agreement that established short-lived peace between the Caucasus countries. Russia was ineffective at best – duplicitous at worst.

The deal also requires that Armenia abandon its legal claims at the International Court of Justice alleging Azerbaijan committed ethic cleaning and genocide, a touchy issue for Armenians who were victims of Turkey’s genocide in the early twentieth century when 1.5 million people were exiled and murdered.

Azerbaijan also demands that Armenia’s constitution “eliminate the claims against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.” In fact. Azerbaijan has made claims against Armenia’s sovereignty. Azerbaijan insists that Armenia’s roads be opened to establish a link between the Azerbaijan enclave of Nakhichevan and Armenian territory. The strategic Zangezur corridor is under Azeri control.

Azerbaijan insists that Armenia replace its founding document. The Pashinyan government insists on a public referendum before amending its charter.

The recent agreement is silent on the status of Armenians who are being held as prisoners of war in Azerbaijan. There is no provision for releasing them or arrangement for the International Committee of the Red Cross to monitor conditions of their detention.

No provision in the agreement exists for the return of displaced people to Karabakh or the protection of Armenians churches and cultural monuments.

Topics: diplomacy, treaty, war

The agreement is silent on compensation for Armenians whose properties were destroyed by invading Azerbaijani forces. No date has been set for an actual signing ceremony. It is unlikely that the agreement will actually be formalized.

History is instructive. The Versailles Treaty of 1918, which ended the First World War, was a flawed agreement. It demanded that Germany pay onerous reparations and thereby set the stage for future conflict. Punitive peace agreements may temporarily stop a war, but risk sowing the seeds for future conflict. Active hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan may be in remission, but conflict will resurface unless Armenians are treated fairly, and reconciliation takes root between the people from both countries.

(David L. Phillips is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Security Studies Program specializing in the South Caucasus. He served as chairman of the Turkey-Amenia Reconciliation Commission and led the Program on Track Two Activities in the South Caucasus.)

Get the Mirror-Spectator Weekly in your inbox: