Former Minister of Justice Grigor Minasyan (left) and former Supreme Judicial Council Chairman Karen Andreasyan.

Former Key Officials Reported Under Corruption Investigation

36
0

By Naria Bughadarian

YEREVAN (Azatutyun) — Prosecutors on November 26 neither confirmed nor denied a report that they are looking into the personal wealth of two former officials believed to have exerted strong influence on Armenian courts for the last two years.

Justice Minister Grigor Minasyan and Karen Andreasyan, the chairman of Armenia’s Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), were forced to resign on October 1 and November 18, respectively, despite showing strong loyalty to Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan throughout their tenure. The two men are close friends and business partners, having reportedly co-founded a law firm years before Pashinyan swept to power in 2018.

In their last acts in office, they engineered the dismissals of dozens of judges who fell afoul of the Armenian authorities. Critics condemned the sackings as a further blow to judicial independence. Minasyan and Andreasyan claimed, however, they on the contrary strengthened the judiciary as part of “reforms” praised by Western officials.

Pashinyan publicly lamented a continuing lack of “justice” in the country on November 15, two days before telling Andreasyan, the heads of two law-enforcement agencies and three senior government officials to resign. They all tendered their resignations the following day.

Citing an unnamed “very reliable” resource, the Yerevan newspaper 168 Zham claimed on November 26 that Andreasyan agreed to quit after Pashinyan pledged to block prosecutors’ efforts to confiscate his and Minasyan’s assets deemed to have been acquired illegally.

Get the Mirror in your inbox:

Armenian courts can allow such confiscations in accordance with a controversial law enacted in 2021. The paper highly critical of Pashinyan said a relevant division of the Office of the Prosecutor-General petitioned one of the courts for that purpose recently after scrutinizing the properties of the two effectively sacked officials and their families. The lawsuits were then “miraculously” withdrawn, it said.

The office denied the 168 Zham report but it did not say whether the prosecutors had indeed opened an asset forfeiture case against Andreasyan or Minasyan.

Andreasyan could not be reached for comment on Tuesday. The former head of the state body tasked with protecting Armenian judges against outside influence defended his track record when he announced his resignation on November 18. He claimed to have “brought the judicial system out of a shameful crisis.”

Arshak Vartanyan, a former member of the SJC, claimed the opposite. He insisted that most of the judges appointed by the SJC were widely respected for their independence and professionalism. By contrast, Vartanian said, Andreasyan proved that he himself is not independent by swiftly agreeing to step down.

Pashinyan claimed late last week that he only “asked,” rather than pressured, Andreasyan to quit. Some legal experts believe, however, that even such requests constitute illegal interference in the work of the judiciary.

 

Get the Mirror-Spectator Weekly in your inbox: